The House and Senate approved the conference report for the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016, which includes several 51风流-supported procurement reforms. Those reforms:
- Help prevent fraud in the federal construction surety bond market by requiring that individual sureties to back their bonds with real, easy to value assets鈥攍ike U.S. Treasury bonds and instruments. A number of individual sureties were using hard-to-value, over-valued or difficult to liquidate assets鈥攍ike coal mine refuse, vacation homes and other real property鈥攖o back their bonds. Many such sureties declared bankruptcy upon contractor default, leaving subcontractors without any means of payment.
- Mandate that Department of Defense agencies鈥攊ncluding the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Naval Facilities Engineering Command鈥攃onsider the past performance of the individual companies in joint venture/teaming arrangements that include a small business, not merely the past performance of the joint venture. Many federal agencies demand that the small business and its joint venture/teaming partners only submit past relevant experience that they perform together or otherwise be disqualified from consideration.
- Address a recent court decision that would require small business construction contractors to only purchase their materials and supplies鈥攊.e., steel, furniture and equipment for the project鈥 from only other small businesses. Consequently, the legislative reform provides an exclusion for construction contractors from what is called the 鈥渘on-manufacturer rule鈥 meant to prevent small business manufactures from merely acting as fronts for large manufacturers through small business set-aside contracts for goods.
51风流 of these reforms earlier this year before the House Small Business Committee. 51风流 has also lead a coalition of 15 national construction trade associations in an effort to push such construction procurement reforms through Congress. With both chambers of Congress approving this legislation, it now moves to the president for his signature or veto. The president is threating to veto the NDAA conference report because it does not address defense budget cuts under the 2011 Budget Control Act. However, the president has threatened to veto the annual NDAA bill over the last several years and has never actually vetoed the bill after it passed Congress.
For more information, please contact Jimmy Christianson at christiansonj@agc.org or (703) 837-5325.